Post by account_disabled on Aug 30, 2023 6:44:17 GMT
Feature image courtesy of TheGiantVerminSurgical oncologist Anees Chagpar explains why there’s wisdom to be found in non-significant and negative results.
anees-chagpar
Researchers don’t dream of negative results, but experiments and trials Switzerland Mobile Number List that don’t go as expected are crucial for moving science forward. To highlight this important part of the research process, we asked research scientists to speak about their own experiences with “failure.” Anees Chagpar is an Associate Professor of Surgery at Yale University and Director of the Breast Center at Smilow Cancer Hospital. She explains why she considers her non-significant and negative studies to be important parts of her publication history.
By Anees Chagpar
Fail early, fail often – that’s what they teach you in business school. Sadly, most physicians and medical researchers fail to see value in failure, and often shirk away from experiments that don’t go the way they had expected, or trials that yield negative results. Indeed, such a bias is propagated in the medical literature. The goal of research, however, should not be simply to find statistical significance in the questions we ask, but rather to ask significant questions and report the answers we find.
When my colleagues and I first started thinking about how we could improve upon margin positivity rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer, we thought that three-dimensional specimen radiography would help. We hypothesized that if surgeons knew where cancer approached the edge of a specimen, they would take more tissue in that particular area, reducing the positive margin and re-excision rate.
anees-chagpar
Researchers don’t dream of negative results, but experiments and trials Switzerland Mobile Number List that don’t go as expected are crucial for moving science forward. To highlight this important part of the research process, we asked research scientists to speak about their own experiences with “failure.” Anees Chagpar is an Associate Professor of Surgery at Yale University and Director of the Breast Center at Smilow Cancer Hospital. She explains why she considers her non-significant and negative studies to be important parts of her publication history.
By Anees Chagpar
Fail early, fail often – that’s what they teach you in business school. Sadly, most physicians and medical researchers fail to see value in failure, and often shirk away from experiments that don’t go the way they had expected, or trials that yield negative results. Indeed, such a bias is propagated in the medical literature. The goal of research, however, should not be simply to find statistical significance in the questions we ask, but rather to ask significant questions and report the answers we find.
When my colleagues and I first started thinking about how we could improve upon margin positivity rates after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer, we thought that three-dimensional specimen radiography would help. We hypothesized that if surgeons knew where cancer approached the edge of a specimen, they would take more tissue in that particular area, reducing the positive margin and re-excision rate.